Dr Barr Rosenberg on the current crisis

I don’t know if this crisis is ‘a little hardship’, but I tend to agree with what Dr Barr Rosenberg (of AXA Rosenberg) has to say about the crisis…

Considering the positive aspects of this crisis, first of all, a little hardship is good for each of us. I think, of course, there is health in alternating good times and bad, in terms of our individual psyches. And it also makes us prudent and gives us experience.

From The AXA Rosenberg ‘Advantage’ - Issue 12.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Fed : There is something you should never rush on..

The Fed seems to be in trouble. President Obama’s proposals for strengthening the Fed’s supervisory power to eventually turn it into the ‘systemic-risk regulator’ are, alas, threatening the Fed rather than enhancing it.

The proposal is, at the least, ill timed. The Fed is particularly vulnerable now. The proposals, by stirring up unnecessary anti-Fed sentiment, could trigger full blown assault against the Fed and undermine its independence.

The oppositions against the proposals are abound and there seems to exist little consensus about the Fed’s expanded role. There are oppositions from agencies that would lose their supervisory authority and power or could be wiped out completely. So many people (not only libertarians and extreme lefties who are more than willing to wage crusade against the ‘supra-legal entity’) are now questioning wisdom of giving more power to the Fed that failed to foresee and prevent the crisis. Lawmakers are getting louder to push through ‘auditing of the Fed’ (but, audit what?).

To be clear, it is not the Fed’s fault that they could not foresee the bubble and the burst. After all, the market could not foresee them, neither. The basic premise of the market economy is that there are few, if any, that can be consistently smarter than the market. If we expect the Fed should be wiser than the market, we should abolish credit market, nationalize all the private banks to integrate them into the Fed, and entrust the Fed to conduct all the allocation of the funds to businesses in the U.S.

The current administration’s rushed proposal, if pushed prematurely, could blow up all the intricate and delicate fabric of arrangements and consensus around the Fed’s independence, whether explicit or implicit, and damage the very idea of the ‘independent central bank’.

There always exist something you should never rush. The reform of the role of the central bank is certainly one of them. Mr Obama should have heeded Volcker’s advice not Summers’s.

(To be very clear, I do not like the contents of the proposal itself, not just the timing of it – the idea of the market where the super-sized regulator governs a few super-sized gambling-banking conglomerates sounds just horrible).

Don’t rush on US systemic risk regulator–Volcker (March 24, Reuters)

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Fake or Real? S&P 500 Breaks Downtrend

Last week S&P 500 seemed to have formed beautiful ‘head and shoulder’, but this week the index shot up and broke upward the downtrend since June 12, rather than fell off the ‘neckline’. We still do not know whether this bounce is real or ‘fake’.

Yes, Q2 earnings are largely above consensus. However it should be noted that the consensus has been drastically revised down for several months – the consensus for second quarter operating EPS for the S&P 500 was $19.92 at the end of 2008, and it now stands at $14.06 (and this estimate is 5% below March when the market bottomed out). So, it seems that markets are still largely driven by sentiment rather than fundamentals.

Yet, it should also be noted that we saw industrial output in EMU turned positive (MoM) in June, and industrial output in the US also seems to be bottoming out. Thus, there should be more, not less, good news in coming months.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Japan: Ruling LDP Crumbled in Tokyo Local Election

The ruling Liberal Democratic Party seems to have suffered crushing defeat in the Tokyo metropolitan assembly. This could be a fatal blow to Taro Aso, the prime minister and the LDP as they are heading for a general election that must be held by October.

This is disturbing development. The opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) is promising heavy transfer payments and hand outs to various sectors of constituents (such as farmers), and (yet) more regulation on already rigid labour market.

The only good news is that Japan may finally be able to get rid of the incompetent prime minister (Taro Aso, having been unable to push through any meaningful reform, deserves this defeat) – but I am skeptical if the next one would be any better.

DPJ Set To Become Top Party In Tokyo Assembly After Election

Posted in Japan | Leave a comment

UK ID card ‘to be accelerated’ (toward abolishment, that is)

The UK’s Government seems to have reversed policy toward controversial national ID card program. The announcement claims ‘ID card roll-out to be accelerated’ (very much Brownesque …), but states that ID cards will no longer be mandatory for UK citizens.

Well, UK citizens can still apply for card – but I doubt there would be many people who want ID tags for themselves. I believe, if the number of UK citizens who ‘opt-in’ is not large enough, the program is likely to be scrapped.

By the way, India is moving toward universal ID card scheme (for 1 billion people?, within 3 years?). Good Luck.

Posted in Europe | Leave a comment

Japanese Equities:More Room to Run ?

Japan’s industrial output rose for a third month in May (by 5.9% MoM). The growth could largely be attributed to re-stocking of inventories that saw drastic decline in the wake of the financial crisis. Yet, total inventories fell 0.6 per cent month-on-month in May, according to METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry).

There still remain significant causes for concern (or even alarm), such as weak end-market demand (both domestic and overseas) and sluggish domestic investment.

However, as Japan is highly cyclical economy, Japanese equity market is expected to perform well with global economic recovery (well, it will recover eventually..), and industrial output is one of the most robust leading indicators for economic activities (while jobless rate typically lags for about 10 months to one year). Thus, I believe there still is upside for Japanese market in mid. term (unless global economy stalls badly in near term).

One caveat: Japan has structural issues such as rigid labour market, and these issues are likely to persist with the lack of political will to reform. Japan will remain ‘pure cyclical play’ that depends heavily on global demand for its capital goods. So, buy low and sell high with economic cycles – it is not for long term holdings.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Does Steve Jobs have to disclose about his health

Graham and Dodd Investor writes:

In SEC filings, top executives of corporations have to disclose their employment history for the past five years, in order for shareholders to judge their suitability for the posts that they hold. Perhaps a similar requirement should extend to certain other aspects of their lives.

This issue came to the forefront in connection with the pancreatic condition of Steve Jobs at Apple. Considering that one man represented the heart and soul of the company, his health was a serious concern for shareholders. Outlines, but probably not sufficient details, of his condition were disclosed on an ad hoc basis.

Should Mr Steve Jobs (or Apple) disclose his health status? YES. It is critical information for investors to make informed decisions. At the least, most people believe it is.

Should investors expect he will? Of course, NOT. He has a right not to disclose his privacy, and I believe such disclosure should not be imposed on anyone by any authority (after all, investors can ‘own’ Apple Inc. but NOT Steve Jobs). And – who do you think he is? He is STEVE JOBS. If you’re a rational investor, you should never expect he will make full disclosure on anything (just for the sake of investors, in particular).

So, you have a choice. – You are prudent and choose not to invest in the company that has serious lack of disclosure on material information (and does not seem to think it is an issue), or you take certain (or huge, depending on your perception) risk on the company that has the incredible CEO and attractive products. You just cannot have it both ways.

Graham and Dodd Investor: What Should Top Executives of Corporations Have to Disclose About Their Personal Lives?

Posted in Business, The U.S. | Leave a comment

The ECB lent €442.2bn

This is interesting. The European Central Bank lent €442.2bn ($622bn) for 12 months to approx 1,100 banks at the ECB’s current key rate of 1%.

What banks would do with this borrowed money? Of course, they will be buying government bonds. If they buy 10-year government bonds of Italy, for instance, they can get 350bp for ‘free’.

Isn’t this quantitative easing (or, queasing)? Yes. Isn’t this same as the central bank buying government bonds? Very close.

What’s the difference? The ECB still can claim they are more prudent than its peers (in a sense, they really are), while doing the same thing.

ECB Lends Record 442 Billion Euros for 12 Months

Posted in Europe, Japan | Leave a comment

WYSWYG – Iran’s Election

It is curious that American people nowadays sometimes seem to be far more “U.S. centric” than in the past. Some people have gone too far to attribute the results of the election in Lebanon to Mr Obama’s speech, and the same people are now screaming at the “stolen election” in Iran.

So many people seem to have difficulty in appreciating the facts that there should be so many things for Iranian voters to worry about, other than things Americans worry about, and that the conflict with the U.S. or other countries could be of little importance for them.

Palestinian people could vote for Hamas, even if it might entail a war with Israel. Iranian people could vote for Mr Ahmadinejad, even if the world is very unhappy with it. (Of course, there might have been fraud, but the results you do not like do not necessarily prove that there was one, nor does it mean the results would have been different).

One more note: Mr Ahmadinejad is reported to have won 62.6 percent of the vote in this election. In 2005, he won 61.69% of the vote when he fought against Mr Rafsanjani (in the runoff).

What you see is What you get.

The Iranian People Speak

Posted in Politics, The U.S. | Leave a comment

If Columbus Had an Advisory Committee…

From a recent report by Marc Faber

Arthur Goldberg

If Columbus had an advisory committee he would probably still be at the dock.

Marc Faber

Had he manned the ship with Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, and Larry Summers, the Santa Maria would have sunk right off the coast of Andalusia from where he sailed from the small port city of Palos de la Frontera.

From Monthly Market Commentary (Marc Faber)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment
  • RSS

  • Twitter

  • Google Ad


  • Categories

  • Meta